Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Jun 2006 17:53:23 -0400 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [patch, -rc5-mm1] locking validator: special rule: 8390.c disable_irq() |
| |
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:37:01AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Couldn't it be possible to have the misrouted irq function mark the > DISABLED_IRQ handlers as IRQ_PENDING? Then have the enable_irq that > actually enables the irq to call the handlers with interrupts disabled > if the IRQ_PENDING is set?
We still have the ambiguity with disable_irq. Really we need to have disable_irq_handler(irq, handler) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |