Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jun 2006 11:42:37 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: NO_HZ Kconfig rework |
| |
On Mon 2006-06-26 09:16:37, Daniel Walker wrote: > I got NO_HZ working on ARM, but because the ARM tree already > extensively implements NO_IDLE_HZ I had to make NO_HZ a > completely seprate option.
So... what is the difference between NO_HZ and NO_IDLE_HZ? Pavel
-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |