Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:15:37 -0700 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][Update][Patch 12/16]Fix undefined ">> 32" in revoke code |
| |
Mingming Cao wrote: > "val >> 32" is undefined if val is a 32-bit value, so this code is > broken if CONFIG_LBD is not set. Make it safe for that case. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> > > > --- > > linux-2.6.17-ming/fs/jbd/revoke.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff -puN fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-revoke-32bit-shift-fix fs/jbd/revoke.c > --- linux-2.6.17/fs/jbd/revoke.c~jbd-revoke-32bit-shift-fix 2006-06-28 16:47:09.695458913 -0700 > +++ linux-2.6.17-ming/fs/jbd/revoke.c 2006-06-28 16:47:09.699458454 -0700 > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static inline int hash(journal_t *journa > { > struct jbd_revoke_table_s *table = journal->j_revoke; > int hash_shift = table->hash_shift; > - int hash = (int)block ^ (int)(block >> 32); > + int hash = (int)block ^ (int)((block >> 31) >> 1); >
It might be better to code it as:
(int)((u64)block >> 32)
... which gcc can trivially recognize as 0 if block is 32 bits. Not sure if it can do that with the code above.
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |