lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Network namespaces a path to mergable code.
    On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:14:41PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > Andrey Savochkin <saw@swsoft.com> writes:
    >
    > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:51:26AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    > >> Andrey Savochkin <saw@swsoft.com> writes:
    > >>
    > >> > One possible option to resolve this question is to show 2 relatively short
    > >> > patches just introducing namespaces for sockets in 2 ways: with explicit
    > >> > function parameters and using implicit current context.
    > >> > Then people can compare them and vote.
    > >> > Do you think it's worth the effort?
    > >>
    > >> Given that we have two strong opinions in different directions I think it
    > >> is worth the effort to resolve this.
    > >
    > > Do you have time to extract necessary parts of your old patch?
    > > Or you aren't afraid of letting me draft an alternative version of socket
    > > namespaces basing on your code? :)
    >
    > I'm not terribly afraid. I can always say you did it wrong. :)

    :)

    > I don't think I am going to have time today. But since this conversation
    > is slowing down and we are to getting into the technical details.
    > I will try and find some time.

    Good.
    I'll focus on my part then.

    Andrey
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-28 20:54    [W:3.692 / U:0.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site