Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:23:51 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm |
| |
On Tue 2006-06-27 09:01:33, Avuton Olrich wrote: > On 6/27/06, Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 07:22:37PM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote: > >> Pavel Machek wrote: > >> >>Some of the advantages of suspend2 over swsusp and uswsusp are: > >> >> > >> >>- Speed (Asynchronous I/O and readahead for synchronous I/O) > >> > > >> >uswsusp should be able to match suspend2's speed. It can do async I/O, > >> >etc... > >> > >> ARGH! > >> > >> And the next version of windows will have all the wonderful features that > >> MacOSX has now so best not upgrade to Mac as you can just wait for the > >> next version of windows. > >> > >> suspend2 has it *now*. It works, it's stable. > > I'm not sure it's a reason for it to go in, but the truth is suspend2 > does work in more cases, ime. uswsusp is alpha(?) swsusp doesn't work > (for me in most cases), suspend-to-ram doesn't work (probably even > less cases than swsusp), suspend2 works. It's working status for more > of the userbase should (hopefully) be a concideration.
When swsusp does not work, there's no point trying uswsusp. It is mostly same code.
suspend-to-ram is a very different animal. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |