lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm
    On 6/27/06, Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 07:22:37PM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
    > > Pavel Machek wrote:
    > > >>Some of the advantages of suspend2 over swsusp and uswsusp are:
    > > >>
    > > >>- Speed (Asynchronous I/O and readahead for synchronous I/O)
    > > >
    > > >uswsusp should be able to match suspend2's speed. It can do async I/O,
    > > >etc...
    > >
    > > ARGH!
    > >
    > > And the next version of windows will have all the wonderful features that
    > > MacOSX has now so best not upgrade to Mac as you can just wait for the
    > > next version of windows.
    > >
    > > suspend2 has it *now*. It works, it's stable.

    I'm not sure it's a reason for it to go in, but the truth is suspend2
    does work in more cases, ime. uswsusp is alpha(?) swsusp doesn't work
    (for me in most cases), suspend-to-ram doesn't work (probably even
    less cases than swsusp), suspend2 works. It's working status for more
    of the userbase should (hopefully) be a concideration.
    --
    avuton
    --
    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-27 18:04    [W:0.048 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site