[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Suspend2-devel] Re: Suspend2 - Request for review & inclusion in -mm
On 6/27/06, Andreas Mohr <> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 07:22:37PM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >>Some of the advantages of suspend2 over swsusp and uswsusp are:
> > >>
> > >>- Speed (Asynchronous I/O and readahead for synchronous I/O)
> > >
> > >uswsusp should be able to match suspend2's speed. It can do async I/O,
> > >etc...
> >
> > ARGH!
> >
> > And the next version of windows will have all the wonderful features that
> > MacOSX has now so best not upgrade to Mac as you can just wait for the
> > next version of windows.
> >
> > suspend2 has it *now*. It works, it's stable.

I'm not sure it's a reason for it to go in, but the truth is suspend2
does work in more cases, ime. uswsusp is alpha(?) swsusp doesn't work
(for me in most cases), suspend-to-ram doesn't work (probably even
less cases than swsusp), suspend2 works. It's working status for more
of the userbase should (hopefully) be a concideration.
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-27 18:04    [W:0.155 / U:2.944 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site