Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:34:44 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] avoid cpu hot removal if busy take3 |
| |
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:10:05 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Fri 2006-06-23 23:35:25, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > I don't think so. > > If we can expect all things can be maintained by user-space in proper way, > > why we need forced migration ? This patch is just one of possible workarounds. > > and implemtns, "success always" and "fail if busy" policy to cpu-hot-remove. > > So... we have piece of policy in kernel, that maybe should not be > there (forced migration). Now, you want to make that policy optional, > and add second piece of policy? > > No no, I'm afraid. Pavel >
Ah, okay. the kernel has the policy in it, so we don't need another policy... Hmm... I want another one policy which is more conservative, but if people says "don't do that", I'll give up this patch.. and consider how to explain users.
Thanks, -Kame
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |