Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:52:32 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] stop on cpu lost |
| |
Pavel Machek wrote: > That's what I'd prefer... as swsusp uses cpu hotplug.
Does it have to? I presume this has been considered before, but what if the other CPUs were just idled for suspend rather than "removed"? Or do you actually need to simulate a hot-remove to make sure they get suspended properly? In general, the "hot remove as suspend" thing seems semantically awkward.
J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |