[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Memory corruption in 8390.c ?
    Ar Mer, 2006-06-21 am 10:23 -0700, ysgrifennodd Ben Pfaff:
    > > + memset(buf, 0, ETH_ZLEN); /* more efficient than doing just the needed bits */
    > > + memcpy(buf, data, ETH_ZLEN);
    > Is this really correct? It zeros out ETH_ZLEN bytes only to
    > immediately copy over all of them again.

    When I did it originally I tested with rdtsc and its actually quicker to
    let it build the static memset the copy data over it than to do the
    extra maths and the variable length loop.

    Hence the comment

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-21 19:41    [W:0.036 / U:13.440 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site