Messages in this thread | | | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [ckpatch][15/29] hz-no_default_250.patch | Date | Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:53:09 +1000 |
| |
On Monday 19 June 2006 21:52, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >Yes I stored a family of these values and 864 was ~ the optimum for a high > >value for desktops and ~84 for a low value but were unpopular for not > > being > > 82 IIRC.
Ah yes here it is
HZ ticks/jiffie 1 second error (ppm) --------------------------------------------------- 82 14551 1.000000152 0.2 96 12429 1.000001829 1.8 209 5709 0.999999314 -0.7 363 3287 0.999999314 -0.7 519 2299 0.999999314 -0.7 864 1381 1.000001829 1.8
> > >something decimally familiar. Also lots of code kind of broke with values > >below 100 in the kernel. > > Ought to be fixed. Just like the code which assumed 100 Hz and broke during > the initial switch to 1000, before we went back again to 250. :p
No impetus to fix them I guess since there is no way to configure the kernel for sub 100 HZ configs without hacking it.
-- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |