Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:24:31 -0400 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: [-mm patch] binfmt_elf: fix checks for bad address |
| |
In-Reply-To: <20060619222512.58ba3e48.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:25:12 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:55:24 -0400 > Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote: > > > -#define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) > TASK_SIZE) > > +#define BAD_ADDR(x) ((unsigned long)(x) >= TASK_SIZE) > > Convince us that this is correct for all the other users of BAD_ADDR() in > this file.
Can I just wave my arms while asserting it's obvious? It seemed that way to me...
There are two more logical pieces to that patch in RHEL4 but those I really didn't understand enough to post. Who's the binfmt_elf expert?
-- Chuck "You can't read a newspaper if you can't read." --George W. Bush - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |