[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 09/11] Task watchers: Add support for per-task watchers
    Andrew Morton wrote:
    > Matt Helsley <> wrote:
    >>>> +static inline int notify_per_task_watchers(unsigned int val,
    >>>> + struct task_struct *task)
    >>>> +{
    >>>> + if (get_watch_event(val) != WATCH_TASK_INIT)
    >>>> + return raw_notifier_call_chain(&task->notify, val, task);
    >>>> + RAW_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&task->notify);
    >>>> + if (task->real_parent)
    >>>> + return raw_notifier_call_chain(&task->real_parent->notify,
    >>>> + val, task);
    >>>> +}
    >>> It's possible for this task to exit without returning a result.
    >> Assuming you meant s/task/function/:
    >> In the common case this will return a result because most tasks have a
    >> real parent. The only exception should be the init task. However, the
    >> init task does not "fork" from another task so this function will never
    >> get called with WATCH_TASK_INIT and the init task.
    >> This means that if one wants to use per-task watchers to associate data
    >> and a function call with *every* task, special care will need to be
    >> taken to register with the init task.
    > no......
    > It's possible for this function to fall off the end without returning
    > anything. The compiler should have spat a warning.

    I checked and it does.

    Peter Williams

    "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
    -- Ambrose Bierce
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-06-21 01:26    [W:0.021 / U:0.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site