On Sat, May 27 2006, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Jens, ml
> 
> I was wondering if cfq io priorities should be explicitly set to the realtime 
> class when no io priority is specified from realtime tasks as in the 
> following patch? (rt_task() will need to be modified to suit the PI changes in
> -mm)

Not sure. RT io needs to be considered carefully, but I guess so does RT
CPU scheduling. For now I'd prefer to play it a little safer, and only
inheric the priority value and not the class.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/