Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:40:09 +0200 | From | Erik Mouw <> | Subject | Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (Jes Sorensen) |
| |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No. Q: Should I leave quotations after my reply?
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:00:26PM +0530, Abu M. Muttalib wrote: > I anticipated that my application which was running perfectly on > linux-2.4.19-rmk7-pxa1 box will run as it is on linux-2.6.13 box as well. > But alas, this is not the case and I fail to understand why it is so? ;-(
I can't tell you. I don't have the source of your application and I my crystal ball is getting old so I can't read the kernel messages from your screen.
Anyway, try to recreate the problem with a *recent* 2.6 kernel. If you can still recreate your problem, post a log over here.
Erik
-- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |