On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:20:14PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:16:51AM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:58:21PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Blease don't add a field to the superblock for the optimal I/O size.
> > > Any filesystem that wants to override it can do so directly in ->getattr.
> > 
> > 	I don't disagree with you, but the idea of everyone implementing
> > ->getattr where they just let it work before scares me.  It's a ton of
> > cut-n-paste error waiting to happen.  Especially if we make something
> > stale.
> > 	Perhaps add generic_fillattr_blksize()?
> 
> Well, as far as I know the only filesystems today that would need to
> do something different are xfs, ocfs2, and reiserfs,

And to answer Joel's statment of these three two already implement their
own ->getattr.  Also it doesn't mean a filesystem has to completely
reimplement it, they just have to override it by reusing generic_fillattr,
e.g.

static int my_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
		struct kstat *stat)
{
	int error = generic_fillattr(dentry->d_inode, stat);
	if (!error)
		stat->blksize = something_useful;
	return error;
}		
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/