[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] CPU controllers?
Mike Galbraith wrote:

> Scheduling contexts do sound useful. They're easily defeated though, as
> evolution mail demonstrates to me every time it's GUI hangs and I see
> that a nice 19 find is running, eating very little CPU, but effectively
> DoSing evolution nonetheless (journal). I wonder how often people who
> tried to distribute CPU would likewise be stymied by other resources.

We do a lot with diskless blades. Basically cpu(s), memory, and network

For this case, cpu, memory, and network controllers are sufficient.
Even just cpu gets you a long way, since mostly we're not IO-intensive
and we generally have a pretty good idea of memory consumption.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-19 20:24    [W:0.074 / U:1.652 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site