[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: squashfs size in statfs
>> > Yes, because CRAM does it that way, and maybe zisofs does it too:
>> Zisofs doesn't (H. Peter Anvin should know as he wrote it :-) ).
>> Statfs should return the size of the filesystem, not the amount of
>> data the filesystem represents. In this respect the behaviour of
>> Squashfs and Zisofs is correct.
>> This is analogous to performing stat on a gzipped file. The stat
>> returns the size of the compressed file, not the uncompressed size.
> A better analogy is it is like statting a sparse file on, say, an ext3
> filesystem. stat (ls -s) and statfs report the amount of storage consumed.
Too bad. Would have been a good indicator of how much space you need to
copy an entire disc to disk, rather than running and waiting for du -s to

So cramfs would need fixing.

Jan Engelhardt
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-17 11:18    [W:0.041 / U:122.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site