lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585
From
Date
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 13:18 +0200, David Osojnik wrote:
> Well i tired cfq,anticipatory,deadline,no-op schedulers/elevators with
> atime but none worked the only difference is when I use noatime and
> nodiratime

That's the result I expected.

> could this be an kernel problem?

Sure seems like one to me. Perhaps someone with a good understanding of
journaling fs will comment. I can only speculate.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-15 14:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog