Messages in this thread | | | From | Janne Karhunen <> | Subject | Re: NFSv3 client reordering RENAMEs | Date | Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:54:33 +0300 |
| |
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:44, Peter Staubach wrote:
> >really expect RENAME to be reordered as mv is generally considered > >atomic. That, and RFC 1813 mandates RENAME to be atomic. Is this a > >known thing and do you guys consider this feature or a bug? > > Can you construct a testcase which exhibits this behavior?
Possibly .. if someone first acks that this indeed would be considered as bug and not as a feature :/
-- // Janne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |