Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:24:26 +0200 (CEST) | From | Bodo Eggert <> | Subject | Re: loop devices removable |
| |
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Pablo Barbáchano wrote: > --- Bodo Eggert <7eggert@elstempel.de> escribió: > > Pablo Barbachano <pablobarbachano@yahoo.es> wrote:
> > [loop devices] > > > > > The (probably broken) reason I want to do that is so I can use (my > > > modified) pmount to mount them. > > > > I'm wondering if fuse would be suited better. I did not yet experiment > > with that, but it seems it has everything you need. > > There is something based on FUSE: > http://lwn.net/Articles/173617/ > > Which involves UML... doesn't seem a good option to me...
I just tried it out, and fuse/uml seems it works out-of-the-box (using a simple mount-like command) while preventing the user from crashing the kernel "using" a corrupt fs image. If you rename the mountlo program to "mount" and put it un the user's path, they won't notice they're using fuse at all, except for not honoring fstab. (Off cause /sbin must come before /usr/local/bin in root's path!)
-- Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say: 39. It is only a minor upgrade, the system should be back up in a few hours. ( This is said on a monday afternoon.) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |