lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Brice Goglin wrote:

> What about GPL modules that don't want to get merged ? I don't know any
> such module that could use this API. But at least there are some webcam
> drivers that don't seem to want to be merged (I don't know why).

There are valid reasons for GPL code to not be merged into mainline.

I (and I'm sure there are others) work on GPL modules/patches that have
no hope of making it into mainline because they're too specialized.
Custom netfilter modules, drivers for special hardware, scheduler
changes, additional instrumentation, etc.

Plus, we're usually working on a stabilized older version, so it's a lot
of extra work to regenerate it against current versions to even try and
merge it.

The source all goes to the customer but it just wouldn't make sense to
have it in mainline.

So the "churn mainline to punish out-of-tree code" argument doesn't make
sense to me. If there's a good reason for the change, then go for
it--but change just to make it hard for out of tree code is simply annoying.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-14 07:31    [W:0.131 / U:11.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site