lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler
Date
Yes, all 3 clients run on a Redhat 9 box.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Galbraith [mailto:efault@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 10:13 PM
To: Kallol Biswas
Cc: Stephen Hemminger; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Radjendirane Codandaramane
Subject: RE: process starvation with 2.6 scheduler

On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:03 -0700, Kallol Biswas wrote:
> It seems that with the priority set to 19 the netserver processes do not starve but still we have unfair scheduling issue. The netperf clients do not timeout now but one of the servers runs much less than the other. It seems that thorough understanding of scheduling algorithm is essential at this point.

Are the clients all on one box?

-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-14 19:59    [W:0.074 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site