[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/6] mm: tracking shared dirty pages
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 14:03 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>Peter Zijlstra <> writes:
>>>From: Peter Zijlstra <>
>>>People expressed the need to track dirty pages in shared mappings.
>>Why only shared mappings? Anonymous pages can be dirty too
>>and would need to be written to swap then before making progress.
> Anonymous pages are per definition dirty, as they don't have a
> persistent backing store.

They can be clean.

> Each eviction of an anonymous page requires IO
> to swap space. On swap-in pages are removed from the swap space to make
> place for other pages.

No they can remain in swap too.

Swap is a bit different because the memory usage patters are going
to be much different. There is no reason why something similar couldn't
be done for swap as well, however I don't think there is so much need
for it that has been demonstrated.

SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-13 14:27    [W:0.077 / U:6.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site