lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> This also means that by default we'd have no false positives at all, but
> that there is a capable annotation method to reduce the amount of false
> negatives, in a gradual and managable way - down to zero if everything
> is annotated.

Yeah, sounds much better to me. However, I am unable to figure out any
real examples where we'd actually need the annotations for reasonably
sane code. Do you have some in mind?

Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-13 10:15    [W:0.099 / U:22.268 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site