lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results
On 6/12/06, Vishal Patil <vishpat@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jens
>
> Could you let me know what tests would be fair to make comparsion
> between the I/O schedulers? Thanks.

any filesystem benchmark should be informative, namesys tests with a
whole suite, bonnie++, iozone, mongo (custom), and one or two others.
You can ask on reiserfs-list for more information.

I suggest testing against more than one filesystem as well, it's quite
common for a FS to "prefer" one scheduler.

NATE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-13 00:24    [W:0.049 / U:0.560 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site