Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:56:11 +0100 | From | "Catalin Marinas" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6 7/9] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives |
| |
On 12/06/06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: > What i'd like to see though are clear explanations about why an > allocation is not considered a leak, in terms of comments added to the > code. That will also help us reduce the number of annotations later on.
I'll document them in both Documentation/kmemleak.txt and inside the code. If I implement the "any pointer inside the block" method, all the memleak_padding() false positives will disappear.
-- Catalin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |