Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:58:55 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: CSCAN vs CFQ I/O scheduler benchmark results |
| |
On Fri, Jun 09 2006, Vishal Patil wrote: > The machine configuation is as follows > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz > Memory: 1027500 KB (1 GB) > Filesystem: ext3 > Kernel: 2.6.16.2
You don't mention the storage used, which is quite relevant.
If you have the time, please rerun with 2.6.17-rc6-gitX latest. Although I'm not sure why you think CSCAN is a good scheduling algorithm, in general it may be fine but there are trivial non-root 'dos' attacks. Any of the non-noop Linux io schedulers is a better choice imo.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |