Messages in this thread |  | | From | (Bernd Eckenfels) | | Subject | Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 | | Date | Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:29:12 +0200 |
| |
Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de> wrote: > I see a different problem with "ext3 + extends is not ext3 anymore" when > the feature goes mainstream: > - user with old distri, no extends in use, no kernel support for them > - user has some kind of problem > - uses new rescue disk (aka knoppix at the time of problem) - that then > is current stuff, and certainly uses extents - fixes problem on disk > (may be a simple as running lilo/grub from chroot, happens often for me) > - tries to boot back into his distri -> *boom* he lost
I dont see a need to enable extends on small filesystems or on existing ones (from within any tool). Why would that happen? Do you had this problem with sparse_super or dir_index?
Gruss Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |