lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Date
Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de> wrote:
> I see a different problem with "ext3 + extends is not ext3 anymore" when
> the feature goes mainstream:
> - user with old distri, no extends in use, no kernel support for them
> - user has some kind of problem
> - uses new rescue disk (aka knoppix at the time of problem) - that then
> is current stuff, and certainly uses extents - fixes problem on disk
> (may be a simple as running lilo/grub from chroot, happens often for me)
> - tries to boot back into his distri -> *boom* he lost

I dont see a need to enable extends on small filesystems or on existing ones
(from within any tool). Why would that happen? Do you had this problem with
sparse_super or dir_index?

Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-10 07:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog