[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans
> ecryptfs-crypto-functions.patch
> ecryptfs-debug-functions.patch
> ecryptfs-alpha-build-fix.patch
> ecryptfs-convert-assert-to-bug_on.patch
> ecryptfs-remove-unnecessary-null-checks.patch
> ecryptfs-rewrite-ecryptfs_fsync.patch
> ecryptfs-overhaul-file-locking.patch
> Christoph has half-reviewed this and all the issues arising from that
> have, I believe, been addressed. With the exception of the "we should
> have a generic stacking layer" issue. Which is true. Michael's take is
> "yes, but that's not my job". Which also is true.

It's far from ready. There's various things that simply can't be done
properly in a lowlevel fs or abosulutely shouldn't. And I think a few
uniqueue gems in there. Most urgent thing of course is that we somehow
need to deal with the idiocy of the nameidata passed into most namespace

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-10 12:26    [W:0.388 / U:1.340 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site