Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:07:41 -0700 | From | "Martin J. Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1 |
| |
> Well, if you don't want to enable a number of options, it's still better > to hide them completely. There are number of options by reorganizing the > debug menu a little, it only depends if we're talking here are about a -mm > only crutch or something which might be useful to more than a handful of > people. A few extra config options are not really a problem as long as > they are logically grouped together (instead of having to enable random > options all over the place).
How is the user meant to know which of your config options a particular option is hidden under?
Same question for the developer as to where to put it?
Seems there are two isses - whether the naming is meaningful or not, and whether you want to hide options under other options,or just flip defaults ... does that sound correct?
M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |