[lkml]   [2006]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: USB devices fail unnecessarily on unpowered hubs
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:58:43 -0400 (EDT)
> Alan Stern <> wrote:
> > As an alternative, we could allow an "over-budget window" of say 10%.
> That, plus we should provide a suitable i-know-what-im-doing user override,
> with the appropriate warnings, as well as a printk which directs users to
> this option when we decided to disable their device.

The user override already exists, as do the appropriate warnings. Daniel
Drake just added a printk explaining why the device was not configured,
although it doesn't tell how to configure the device by hand. Perhaps a
FAQ entry at would be appropriate.

> The power supply spec is a conservative minimum, whereas the device spec is
> a worst-case maximum. One would expect a lot of devices will work OK when
> run "out of spec".
> (Goes away and pats all his 240V plugpacks which are happily working off 110V).

They probably will. The question is, how far out-of-spec should the
kernel allow by default? 200% is likely to be too far (your plugpacks

Alan Stern

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-06-01 19:10    [W:0.105 / U:0.800 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site