[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] SPARSEMEM + NUMA can't handle unaligned memory regions?
    On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 02:34:51PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
    > 3) record the nid -- when we record the memory present in the system we
    > are passed the nid.
    > Somehow the last of these seems the most logical given we have the
    > correct information at the time we record that we need to instantiate
    > the section. So I had a quick go at something which seems to have come
    > out pretty clean. Attached is a completly untested patch to show what I
    > am proposing.

    Looks sane to me. I've always wanted to encode the nid in the section.
    But, never had a compelling reason to do so.

    With this code in place, we could optimize the pfn_to_nid() routines to
    now obtain the nid from the section (rather than page struct). However,
    I'm not sure this is worth the effort.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-09 18:07    [W:0.021 / U:4.624 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site