lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: sched_clock() uses are broken
    Mike Galbraith wrote:

    >Sorry for yet another reply, but running the old starvation testcase
    >that caused sched_clock() to be born in the first place tickled my
    >funny-bone. With that running and hitting 300k context switches...
    >
    >now: 2100508962835 tick: 2100508972067 stamp: 2100508961220 total: 2906
    >now: 2101531243883 tick: 2101531251877 stamp: 2101531238543 total: 2924
    >now: 2102695422392 tick: 2102695431699 stamp: 2102695418265 total: 2940
    >
    >Accounting? Not :)
    >

    Yeah I agree with Andi that this accounting stuff is probably done
    for some POSIX conformance that doesn't matter. Actually it is worse
    than that because if anyone _really_ did need it, then they'll get a
    horrible surprise when their system mysteriously fails in production.

    It should either get ripped out, or perhaps converted to use jiffies
    until a sane high resolution, low overhead scheme is developed (if
    ever). And that would exclude something that does this accounting in
    fastpaths for the 99.99% of processes that never use it.

    --

    Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-08 06:48    [W:0.034 / U:0.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site