[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: sched_clock() uses are broken
On Wed, 3 May 2006, George Anzinger wrote:

> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Yet that counter isn't necessarily nanosecond based. So rescaling the
> > returned value to nanosecs requires expensive divisions which could be done
> > only once within sched_clock_diff() instead of twice as often in each
> > sched_clock() calls.
> Oh phooey!! Scaling can be done with a mpy and a shift. See the new clock
> code where the TSC (or what ever) is scaled to ns.

I know.

And if you want to preserve more than 32 bits of precision you need 4
mpy_and_add insns with a shift on ARM at least.

But the point remains that it is more efficient to do it once rather
than twice or more.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-04 16:21    [W:0.061 / U:2.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site