[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: sched_clock() uses are broken
    On Wed, 3 May 2006, George Anzinger wrote:

    > Nicolas Pitre wrote:
    > > Yet that counter isn't necessarily nanosecond based. So rescaling the
    > > returned value to nanosecs requires expensive divisions which could be done
    > > only once within sched_clock_diff() instead of twice as often in each
    > > sched_clock() calls.
    > Oh phooey!! Scaling can be done with a mpy and a shift. See the new clock
    > code where the TSC (or what ever) is scaled to ns.

    I know.

    And if you want to preserve more than 32 bits of precision you need 4
    mpy_and_add insns with a shift on ARM at least.

    But the point remains that it is more efficient to do it once rather
    than twice or more.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-04 16:21    [W:0.021 / U:33.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site