* Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> wrote:

> Building 2.6.17-rc5-mm1, I get this:
> 
> 	net/built-in.o: In function `ip_rt_init':
> 	(.init.text+0xb04): undefined reference to `__you_cannot_kmalloc_that_much'

could you try the patch below and set NR_CPUS back to 32?

-----------
Subject: lock validator: fix RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

on lockdep we have a quite big spinlock_t, so keep the size down.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c |   23 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Index: linux/net/ipv4/route.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ linux/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -212,17 +212,22 @@ struct rt_hash_bucket {
 /*
  * Instead of using one spinlock for each rt_hash_bucket, we use a table of spinlocks
  * The size of this table is a power of two and depends on the number of CPUS.
+ * (on lockdep we have a quite big spinlock_t, so keep the size down there)
  */
-#if NR_CPUS >= 32
-#define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	4096
-#elif NR_CPUS >= 16
-#define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	2048
-#elif NR_CPUS >= 8
-#define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	1024
-#elif NR_CPUS >= 4
-#define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	512
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+# define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	256
 #else
-#define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	256
+# if NR_CPUS >= 32
+#  define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	4096
+# elif NR_CPUS >= 16
+#  define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	2048
+# elif NR_CPUS >= 8
+#  define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	1024
+# elif NR_CPUS >= 4
+#  define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	512
+# else
+#  define RT_HASH_LOCK_SZ	256
+# endif
 #endif
 
 static spinlock_t	*rt_hash_locks;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/