Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] s390: Hypervisor File System | From | Michael Holzheu <> | Date | Wed, 3 May 2006 15:38:19 +0200 |
| |
Hi Jörn,
Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> wrote on 05/03/2006 03:22:39 PM: > On Wed, 3 May 2006 15:18:41 +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote: > > > o People are not forced to follow the convention. If they don't and > you break an existing application, you get the blame.
Sure, but this is really just a matter of definition. The kernel defines the ABI, right?. User space has to follow the rules. If they break the rules that's badluck for the userspace tools. Currently you can also get kernel information directly from /dev/mem. If an application does that, nobody would say, that we are not allowed to change kernel data structures because of that user space application.
> o Now you have a dependency on the standard parser, which is in > userspace. Any bug in any version of the standard parser and...
At least this parser should be well tested, if everybody uses it.
But maybe I am completely wrong here ....
Michael
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |