[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCHSET] block: fix PIO cache coherency bug
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Has any discussion about this problem lead to some consensus?

Argghhh.. I completely forgot about this.

>> What do you think of the kmap_atomic_pio() (notoriously bad at names,
>> but it should get the point across) and kunmap_atomic_pio(), the latter
>> accepting a read/write flag to note if we wrote to a vm page?
>> This is basically Tejuns original patch set, just moving it out of the
>> block layer so it's a generel exported property of the kmap api.
> What was the problem with Tejun's patchset already to which RMK (and
> many others) agreed?
> I do have hardware that exhibits the problem and therefore I wish the
> discussion could be resumed.

I'll follow up soon. Sorry.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-30 04:22    [W:0.078 / U:10.088 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site