Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 May 2006 18:35:12 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [patch 27/61] lock validator: prove spinlock/rwlock locking correctness |
| |
On Mon, 29 May 2006 23:25:23 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> +# define spin_lock_init_key(lock, key) \ > + __spin_lock_init((lock), #lock, key)
erk. This adds a whole new layer of obfuscation on top of the existing spinlock header files. You already need to run the preprocessor and disassembler to even work out which flavour you're presently using.
Ho hum. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |