[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] request_firmware without a device
    On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:50:45AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
    > The patch allows calling request_firmware without a 'struct device'.
    > It appears we just need a name here from 'struct device'. I changed it
    > to use a kobject as Patrick suggested.
    > Next patch will use the new API to request firmware (microcode) for a CPU.

    But a cpu does have a struct device. Why not just use that?

    > +fw_setup_class_device_id(struct class_device *class_dev, struct kobject *kobj)
    > {
    > /* XXX warning we should watch out for name collisions */
    > - strlcpy(class_dev->class_id, dev->bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE);
    > + strlcpy(class_dev->class_id, kobj->k_name, BUS_ID_SIZE);

    There's a function for this, kobject_name(), please never touch k_name

    > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_firmware_kobj);

    Ick, if you really want to do this, just fix up all callers of
    request_firmware(), there aren't that many of them.

    But I don't recommend it anyway.


    greg k-h
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-25 06:06    [W:0.019 / U:46.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site