Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 23 May 2006 15:26:20 -0700 | From | Zachary Amsden <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/3] vdso: improve print_fatal_signals support by adding memory maps |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > > static void print_fatal_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, int signr) > { > @@ -781,9 +870,13 @@ static void print_fatal_signal(struct pt > printk("%02x ", insn); > } > } > -#endif > printk("\n"); > + if (current->mm) > + printk("vDSO at %p\n", current->mm->context.vdso); > +#endif > show_regs(regs); > + printk("\n"); > + print_vmas(); > } > > static int __init setup_print_fatal_signals(char *str
Perhaps I should have read your first patch more carefully - it did have register info. This looks even better (although you may now want to allow it to be #ifdef'd out under CONFIG_EMBEDDED).
You probably should use PATH_MAX+1 instead of SIZE or check IS_ERR() on the string from d_path.
Zach - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |