[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] implicit declaration of function `page_cache_release'
 On Sat, Aug 06, David S. Miller wrote:

> From: Olaf Hering <>
> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:01:03 +0200
> > So the patch should be reverted? Its only for CONFIG_SWAP=n, rather
> > unusual for KDE/GNOME tainted workstations...
> Not necessarily, but the header dependencies should be fixed
> up somehow.

I think you are right once again.
(Just the time got a bit out of sync.)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-22 09:13    [W:0.039 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site