lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)
Replying to Vlad Yasevich:
> /* This is only to work around buggy Windows95/2000
> * VJ compression implementations. If the ID field
> * does not change, they drop every other packet in
> * a TCP stream using header compression.
> */

Unfortunately, cisco IOS also complains that packets are "duplicate".
And, regarding to your previous message on how to fix this - IIRC, if
I do connect() on this socket, it will refuse to receive datagrams
from hosts other than specified in connect(), and I will be unable to
bind another socket to the same port on my side.

That said, the only solution which is close to what been before, will
be to keep one socket for receive, and create socket for each router I
am communicating with, right?

--
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my pgp key
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-22 22:23    [W:0.058 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site