[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Was change to ip_push_pending_frames intended to break udp (more specifically, WCCP?)
> IP id is set to 0 on unconnected sockets when the DF bit is set (path
> mtu discovery is enabled). Try issuing a connect() in your application
> and see if the ids are increasing again.

ID of zero again? I thought that went away years ago? Anyway, given
the number of "helpful" devices out there willing to clear the DF bit,
fragment and forward, perhaps always setting the IP ID to 0, even if DF
is set, isn't such a good idea?

rick jones
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-22 20:51    [W:0.079 / U:9.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site