lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Monday 22 May 2006 00:28, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > You make a good point. In fact, given it's unthrottled, someone
> > > > > > with too much time on their hands could easily fill up a /var
> > > > > > just by calling unimplemented syscalls this way.
> > > >
> > > > I never bought this argument because there are tons of printks in the kernel
> > > > that can be triggered by everybody.
> > >
> > > Then they should also be either rate limited, or removed.
> >
> > Yes let's remove all that kernel debugging support. It is totally useless
> > for most users, isn't it?
>
> If a regular user can trip up debugging printks, yes, lets remove it.
> Examples ?
>
> Dave
>
>
allmost all selinux messages.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-22 08:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans