lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64
    Dave Jones wrote:
    > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > On Monday 22 May 2006 00:28, Dave Jones wrote:
    > > > On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:19:08AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > > > You make a good point. In fact, given it's unthrottled, someone
    > > > > > > with too much time on their hands could easily fill up a /var
    > > > > > > just by calling unimplemented syscalls this way.
    > > > >
    > > > > I never bought this argument because there are tons of printks in the kernel
    > > > > that can be triggered by everybody.
    > > >
    > > > Then they should also be either rate limited, or removed.
    > >
    > > Yes let's remove all that kernel debugging support. It is totally useless
    > > for most users, isn't it?
    >
    > If a regular user can trip up debugging printks, yes, lets remove it.
    > Examples ?
    >
    > Dave
    >
    >
    allmost all selinux messages.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-22 08:01    [W:0.021 / U:31.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site