Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 May 2006 11:30:23 -0400 (EDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm2 |
| |
On Sun, 21 May 2006, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2006 01:19:20 EDT, James Morris said: > > On Sun, 21 May 2006, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > > > Was it *really* intended that SELINUX not be selectable if NETWORK_SECMARK > > > isn't present? > > > > Yes, it's required for SELinux. > > Could stand a SELECT instead, then?
I think there are times when you need a SELECT, like when you need a specific set of crypto algorithms for something to work, but this is a distinct core requirement of SELinux, and too many SELECTs makes the configuration system unweildy.
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |