[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: swapper: page allocation failure.
Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:31:12AM +0200, Haar J?nos wrote:
>>[root@st-0001 /]# uname -a
>>Linux st-0001 2.6.17-rc3-git1 #2 SMP Sun May 21 01:12:22 CEST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> did earlier kernels work OK?
>>This is a simple disk node.
>>It serves the md0 array, and uses mem for buffering-caching.
> odd, i looks like you've leaked alot of lowmem but i can't think why
> i've got major (induced) brain-fog right now so i'll have to think
> about it tomorrow sorry

The buffers are buffercache rather than the usual pagecache; due to
nbd I guess. Buffercache cannot be satisfied by highmem.

This would be a relatively uncommon setup, which explains why it
isn't working 100%. I don't know of any reason why reclaim speed
should be worse for buffercache, however one notable thing will be
that zone_normal's lowmem reserve that is untouchable by pagecache
will be eaten by buffercache...

Anyway, increasing /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes should help. Janos,
perhaps you could try doubling it and see how you go?

SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-21 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean