Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 May 2006 21:38:18 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: IA32 syscall 311 not implemented on x86_64 |
| |
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 02:56:10PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Actually it is kinda throttled, but only on process name. > This patch just removes that stuff completely. > (Also removes a bunch of trailing whitespace) > > Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > > --- linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c~ 2006-05-21 14:50:57.000000000 -0400 > +++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/arch/x86_64/ia32/sys_ia32.c 2006-05-21 14:51:48.000000000 -0400 > @@ -522,17 +522,9 @@ sys32_waitpid(compat_pid_t pid, unsigned > } > > int sys32_ni_syscall(int call) > -{ > - struct task_struct *me = current; > - static char lastcomm[sizeof(me->comm)]; > - > - if (strncmp(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm))) { > - printk(KERN_INFO "IA32 syscall %d from %s not implemented\n", > - call, me->comm); > - strncpy(lastcomm, me->comm, sizeof(lastcomm)); > - } > - return -ENOSYS; > -} > +{ > + return -ENOSYS; > +} >...
Why can't we remove sys32_ni_syscall() and call sys_ni_syscall() instead if all we want to do is to return -ENOSYS?
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |