lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Was this really supposed to go in?
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:36:40PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Commit 2c171bf13423dc5293188cea7f6c2da1720926e2 in Linus' tree seems
> strange. It includes more changes than Pavel's original patch, but with
> the same commit message.

They shouldn't have gone in - they were a change I was working on a few
days ago which I left in the git tree uncommitted. Applying Pavel's
patch then committed them.

> Also, I think the extra changes are broken as we then would have two
> parameters that have that contain the same information, yet the do not
> have the same ranges.

It's part of transitioning the data transfers over to taking the byte
size instead of the log2 byte size.

Well, I can't do anything about it now - I'm going away for a couple
of weeks from tomorrow morning.

--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-20 17:50    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans