lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Was this really supposed to go in?
    On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:36:40PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
    > Commit 2c171bf13423dc5293188cea7f6c2da1720926e2 in Linus' tree seems
    > strange. It includes more changes than Pavel's original patch, but with
    > the same commit message.

    They shouldn't have gone in - they were a change I was working on a few
    days ago which I left in the git tree uncommitted. Applying Pavel's
    patch then committed them.

    > Also, I think the extra changes are broken as we then would have two
    > parameters that have that contain the same information, yet the do not
    > have the same ranges.

    It's part of transitioning the data transfers over to taking the byte
    size instead of the log2 byte size.

    Well, I can't do anything about it now - I'm going away for a couple
    of weeks from tomorrow morning.

    --
    Russell King
    Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
    maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-20 17:50    [W:0.020 / U:1.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site