[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Was this really supposed to go in?
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 05:36:40PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Commit 2c171bf13423dc5293188cea7f6c2da1720926e2 in Linus' tree seems
> strange. It includes more changes than Pavel's original patch, but with
> the same commit message.

They shouldn't have gone in - they were a change I was working on a few
days ago which I left in the git tree uncommitted. Applying Pavel's
patch then committed them.

> Also, I think the extra changes are broken as we then would have two
> parameters that have that contain the same information, yet the do not
> have the same ranges.

It's part of transitioning the data transfers over to taking the byte
size instead of the log2 byte size.

Well, I can't do anything about it now - I'm going away for a couple
of weeks from tomorrow morning.

Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux -
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-05-20 17:50    [W:0.035 / U:5.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site