Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 02 May 2006 18:30:15 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: Compiling C++ modules |
| |
Kyle Moffett wrote: > On May 2, 2006, at 11:19:35, Avi Kivity wrote: >> I wasn't talking about modifying gcc to do the checking, rather using >> language features so that the checks would happen during a regular >> compile. That would mean we weren't dependent on somebody running >> sparse with a configuration that triggers the bug, but those few who >> compile the code before submitting the patch would get it >> automatically checked. > > There's a reason that we tell all patch submitters to run "make C=1" > on several configs before submitting patches. Besides, you seem to > have a vast misunderstanding of LK development processes; we frown > heavily on people who don't "compile their code before submitting the > patch", it's not a rare thing at all. >
That was tongue in cheek. Perhaps I should have added a smiley.
I follow lkml quite closely, even though I lack the time to contribute in the areas that interest me.
-- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |