[lkml]   [2006]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 2/3] reliable stack trace support (x86-64)
    >>> Andi Kleen <> 16.05.06 19:05 >>>
    >On Tuesday 16 May 2006 18:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
    >> >>> Andi Kleen <> 16.05.06 17:13 >>>
    >> On Tuesday 16 May 2006 16:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
    >> >> These are the x86_64-specific pieces to enable reliable stack traces. The
    >> >> only restriction with this is that it currently cannot unwind across the
    >> >> interrupt->normal stack boundary, as that transition is lacking proper
    >> >> annotation.
    >> >
    >> >It would be nice if you could submit a patch to fix that.
    >> But I don't know how to fix it. See my other mail
    >which mail?

    Reply to Ingo (with you on cc) regarding patch 1/3. Just saying that I don't know much about expressions here.

    >> - I have no experience with expressions, nor have I ever seen them in
    >> use.
    >I remember Jim Houston used a hack of just loading the old stack into a register
    >and defining that as a base register in CFI. I guess i would be willing
    >to trade a few moves for that (should be pretty much free on a OOO CPU anyways)
    >You think that trick would work?

    I don't think that would, because without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO none of the preserved registers get saved, hence there's no
    register to use for this. Thus the price would not only be a move, but also a save/push and a reload/pop.

    >> >> +#define UNW_PC(frame) (frame)->
    >> >> +#define UNW_SP(frame) (frame)->regs.rsp
    >> >
    >> >I think we alreay have instruction_pointer(). Better add a stack_pointer()
    >> >in ptrace.h too.
    >> I could do that, but the macros will have to remain, as they don't access pt_regs directly, so I guess it'd be
    >> pointless to change it.
    >UNW_PC() is instruction_pointer(&frame->regs), isn't it?

    Yes. But the intention is that the user of UNW_PC doesn't need to know any details of what fields frame has (i.e. the
    parameter of UNW_PC must only be frame), so you can't replace it with instruction_pointer().

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-05-18 11:38    [W:0.021 / U:4.872 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site